Bloomberg Quint features Rukshad Davar’s views on SEBI’s amendment of the investment advisers regulations

by | Jul 9, 2020

From Oct. 1, individual investment advisers can either distribute investment products or advise on them, but can’t do both. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has amended the Investment Advisers Regulations, setting a tone for a reform that may change business dynamics for these entities.

Any person who advises clients on purchase, sale, investment, or portfolio management in securities for consideration is an ‘investment adviser’ under the SEBI regulations. A person is restricted from providing such services unless she obtains a certificate of registration from the regulator.

The amendment also aims to strengthen the existing regulatory framework by making it mandatory for a non-individual investment advisor to introduce client level segregation between advisory and distribution activities. It also introduces revised net worth criteria for individuals and corporate persons.

Part of the amendment are key changes that introduce segregation of services wherein:

  • The same client cannot be offered both kinds of services through a non-individual adviser’s group entities. Thus a holding, subsidiary, joint venture or associate company of an advisor can only provide one type of service to such client.
  • Non-individual advisers must maintain an arms-length relationship between their advisory and distribution functions by rendering services through a separate department or division.

and corporatization of Individual advisors to further standardize the investment advisory business and improve its quality.

Rukshad Davar, Partner, and Head of M&A, at Majmudar & Partners, shares his views with media outlet Bloomberg Quint on this move along with other industry experts.

The article discusses several possible outcomes from the amendment and provides expert opinions on the subject from established industry professionals.

Read the article here.

More News

India – Arbitration Update

In the recent ruling of Orissa Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. v. SBW Electro Mechanics Import Export Corporation (2023 SCC OnLine Cal 1583), the Calcutta High Court (HC), in deciding the validity of an arbitration clause, has held that the venue of the arbitral proceedings must...

read more

Benchmark Litigation rankings 2023

We are pleased to share that we have been ranked for multiple practice areas in the Benchmark Litigation 2023 rankings. Firm Rankings Commercial and Transactions Construction Government and Regulatory Insolvency International Arbitration Labour and Employment...

read more

New authority for company strike off

To simplify the processing of applications to strike off Indian companies from the register (a step which comes after liquidation formalities are complete and effectively marks the closure of an Indian company), on March 17, 2023, India’s Ministry of Corporate...

read more

India – Insurance Update

The IRDAI has notified three regulations, which came into force on April 1, 2023, that are poised to grant insurers greater freedom in their organizational management and will have a material impact on insurers, insurance intermediaries and insurance agents.  ...

read more