The Reserve Bank of India has issued a notification to regulate the functioning of DLPs

by | Jul 3, 2020

Pursuant to various complaints made by borrowers against digital lending platforms (DLPs), including for high-interest rates, harsh recovery measures, and unauthorized use of borrowers’ personal data, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a notification to regulate the functioning of DLPs. 

The main thrust of the RBI’s notification is that outsourcing of any activity by a bank/NBFC to a DLP will not diminish the former’s obligations.  Banks/NBFCs engaged in sourcing loans through DLPs must ensure that all of the RBI’s instructions are followed, i.e.,

  • display the name of the DLP on the website of bank/NBFC;
  • ensure that the DLP discloses the name of the lending bank/NBFC to the borrower;
  • ensure that the sanction letter is issued on the letterhead of the bank/NBFC before execution of the loan agreement with the borrower;
  • furnish a copy of loan agreement with all enclosures to the borrower; and
  • effectively, oversee and monitor the DLP, and spread awareness of grievance redressal mechanisms available to the borrower. 

 DLPs will have to brace for more regulatory supervision and ensure that sharp practices are curtailed.

More News

The Legal 500 2024 Rankings

We are pleased to share that our firm has been recognised for its work across practice areas by The Legal 500 (Legalease) in their 2024 rankings. Firm Rankings Antitrust and Competition Corporate and M&A Data Protection Dispute Resolution: Litigation Intellectual...

read more

“Workman” interpreted under Indian employment law

In the recent case of Rohit Dembiwal v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., the Bombay High Court held that an IT analyst did not qualify as a “workman” under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as his day-to-day responsibilities were supervisory in nature, and his...

read more

EXL deemed not to have a PE in India

Last week, in the EXL Service.Com, Inc. case, the Delhi Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) followed the Supreme Court’s rulings in the Formula One and E-Funds cases and, inter alia, held that a US taxpayer does not have a fixed place permanent establishment...

read more