Neerav Merchant speaks to Livemint on Delhi High Court ruling in Amazon vs Future Retail case

by | Dec 23, 2020

The Delhi high court permitted Future Retail Ltd (FRL) to proceed with the sale of its assets to a unit of Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), leaving it to regulators to decide the fate of the deal, while allowing Amazon.com Inc. to approach appropriate forums to oppose the transaction.

In its ruling on Monday, a single-judge bench of the Delhi high court said the 24,713-crore transaction between Future Group and Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd did not violate any statutory legal provisions, and both parties were free to seek approval for the deal from regulators.

The ruling, which can be challenged in a higher court, shifts the spotlight to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and the ministry of corporate affairs where Amazon is challenging the deal. The Competition Commission of India, the third regulator, cleared the transaction in November.

Neerav Merchant, Partner at Majmudar & Partners recently spoke to finance publication, Mint on the final ruling and its implications.

In his words, “It is important to know how the concerned parties have perceived the interim award, which was obtained by Amazon in October 2020, because, FRL seems to be going ahead with the deal, despite the SIAC interim award. This raises a pertinent question, i.e., how would the concerned litigants (in the present case) react, had such interim award been pronounced by an arbitral tribunal seated in India. The very fact that Amazon (and FRL) have, in connection with this matter, approached the regulators or authorities in the past; hence, not much is left in terms of injuncting Amazon against. The honorable court would have also factored in this fact, among the other reasons it provided for not injuncting Amazon.”

Read the full ruling here.

More News

ITR World Tax – 2024 Rankings

We are pleased to share that the firm has been ranked by ITR World Tax for our work in Indirect Tax, General Corporate Tax and Transfer Pricing. Ravi S. Raghavan, Partner - Tax and Private Client Group, has been ranked as a highly regarded practitioner...

read more

India – Arbitration Update

In the recent ruling of Orissa Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. v. SBW Electro Mechanics Import Export Corporation (2023 SCC OnLine Cal 1583), the Calcutta High Court (HC), in deciding the validity of an arbitration clause, has held that the venue of the arbitral proceedings must...

read more